# Is this the right set of categories?

**URL:** <https://forum.interledger.org/t/is-this-the-right-set-of-categories/63>\
**Category:** Site Feedback\
**Created:** [February 6, 2019, 2:47pm UTC](https://forum.interledger.org/t/is-this-the-right-set-of-categories/63 "2019-02-06T14:47:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emschwartz](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.interledger.org/emschwartz/32/12_2.png) [@emschwartz](https://forum.interledger.org/u/emschwartz)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 2:47pm UTC](https://forum.interledger.org/t/is-this-the-right-set-of-categories/63/1 "2019-02-06T14:47:14Z")

</div>

Do these categories make sense? Are there any missing or any we should take out/rename?

For example, the discussion in the [Anypay Protocol](https://forum.interledger.org/t/anypay-protocol/40/5) thread suggests that the line between “Protocol Design” and “Applications and Use Cases” might not be so clear.

What do you think?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![akash](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.interledger.org/akash/32/22_2.png) [@akash](https://forum.interledger.org/u/akash)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 3:26pm UTC](https://forum.interledger.org/t/is-this-the-right-set-of-categories/63/2 "2019-02-06T15:26:51Z")

</div>

Perhaps change Protocol Design to Interledger Core? I think it’s ambiguous because protocols can be applications too…