# Anypay Protocol

**URL:** <https://forum.interledger.org/t/anypay-protocol/40>\
**Category:** Applications and Use Cases\
**Created:** [February 6, 2019, 4:15am UTC](https://forum.interledger.org/t/anypay-protocol/40 "2019-02-06T04:15:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sabinebertram](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.interledger.org/sabinebertram/32/48_2.png) [@sabinebertram](https://forum.interledger.org/u/sabinebertram)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 11:59pm UTC](https://forum.interledger.org/t/anypay-protocol/40/8 "2019-02-06T23:59:57Z")

</div>

> [@justmoon](#):
>
> Every optional field like that should be moved into a separate spec that is targeted at a specific use case.

@justmoon I created another topic to discuss that: [Push Payments and Invoices](https://forum.interledger.org/t/push-payments-and-invoices/103)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.interledger.org/t/anypay-protocol/40)._